+ 2..
उ.
"alleged to be concerned in Piracy" As there is no distinctive
mark of a
Houghtong Vessel whereby
one can be known at a
distance,
and as her Pagister is the only
means
斥
identifying
hen,
I
cannot understand how
Lieutenant Walker concluded becaus
that there dunks belonged to
Hongkong.
They either had papers
they had not; if they had and there
papers were issued
by
h. bred
the authorities
a this Port, the vessels should have Been seized and brought in for enguing
and punishment; if they had not, or if their papers
kn
འ
A 145
M. fact
158
were note of Stongkong, then Houstong is not responsible for their soings
supposed.
real
am sorry
I have not
opportunity of questioning
Walker on the point,
Lieutenant Walker
I
the
but that Officer is no
longer
A
regards
"clearance" paper.
the station.
the absence of a Custour House
there
explains the non-issue of and it is possible that there versels though not Stoughtong Boats – 4.6. not having Stonghong Registers may have visited Stoughtong and in the
perfect freedom of
character
may
the Pork their
not have been
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.